Tradwife Influencing and Its Harmful Similarities to the 50’s Housewife
A
woman. She serves dinner to her family with a smile on her face. She cooks,
cleans, and tends to the children while her husband goes to work to bring home
the daily bread- a classic advertisement pasted on magazines and newspapers
throughout the latter half of the 20th century. Or is it the depiction of a
modern woman? The perfect, American, nuclear family. But the reality is not so
well-hidden.. My US History teacher liked to introduce us to songs that are
reflective of the era she is teaching. One song in particular stood out to me.
“Mother's Little Helper” by the Rolling Stones, released in 1966, highlights
the realities of being a stay-at-home mother in that era. Since those times,
the Feminist movement has pushed this lifestyle aside, encouraging the working
woman. In modern times, the average American family consists of two working
parents and a number of kids. However, recent movements like the “tradwife”
have shifted this modern way of life. This movement, which gained popularity on
TikTok and Instagram, encourages women to remain at home and provide their
families with home-cooked meals and all-natural lifestyles. The gaining social
media influence of the tradwife movement is similar to that of the 50s, with
housewives. Because of what we know about the realities of being a 50s
housewife, the social media influence of the tradwife movement is harmful.
With the rising popularity of the
tradwife trend-turned-movement, there remains a question of why it has gained
so much popularity. Tradwife, short for Traditional Wife, is a relatively new
trend on social media, mainly on TikTok and Instagram. It was during the
COVID-19 pandemic that TikTok gained massive popularity, especially with young
people. According to Drew Harwell with The Washington Post, “Two-thirds of
American teens use the app, and 1 in 6 say they watch it ‘almost constantly,’…
And while half of TikTok’s U.S. audience is younger than 25, the app is winning
grown-ups’ attention, too.” Large numbers of people, particularly those under
the age of 25, are being consciously and subconsciously influenced by the
possibly hundreds of TikTok’s watched daily.
Because of the incredible popularity
of TikTok, influencers of all kinds have gained massive popularity. Tradwives
fall under the lifestyle influencer category. With those who wish to make it
big as a lifestyle influencer, it is essential to establish a “brand”. Not a
material item you wish to sell, but an idea: “Lifestyle marketing focuses on a
niche target market's ideals, everyday interests, and values that align with
the lifestyle they want to lead. Rather than selling a product, lifestyle
brands advertise a way of life instead.” (Brook Boucher). If lifestyle
influencers are selling what viewers aspire to be, then what are tradwife
influencers trying to sell?
Lifestyle influencers Nara Smith
and Ballerina Farm have gained popularity in recent years on TikTok. Both of
these women post TikTok videos that showcase their “traditional” lives. Nara
Smith (@naraazizasmith on TikTok), wife and mother of three, gained popularity
by posting TikTok videos of her home-cooked meals from scratch. Viewers marvel
at her soft-spoken voice and ASMR-quality videos. Before becoming a mother and
influencer, Nara Smith was a famous model with IMG Models. Hanna Neeleman,
commonly referred to as Ballerina Farm (@ballerinafarm on TikTok), is a mother
of eight who gained popularity by posting TikTok videos about her family, life
on their farm, and company. Before becoming a mother and influencer, she
attended The Juilliard School as a ballerina. As of April 2025, Nara Smith has
11.7 million followers and 662.7 million likes. Ballerina Farm has 9.7 million
followers and 170.4 million likes.
Receiving
likes and followers is a huge part of lifestyle influence. When selling a
“brand,” lifestyle influencers must strive for relatability while maintaining
an “ideal” lifestyle. “A whopping 35% of users follow brands on TikTok. This is
fantastic news for anyone who wants to highlight their unique product or brand
on the platform. Users are always looking for something innovative and new to
follow and buy into and are actively searching for brand recommendations and
creative content.” (Entrepreneur, 2023) Though neither of these women
explicitly identifies with the tradwife term, both are large figureheads in the
TikTok sphere for this new tradwife movement. What’s being sold by these two
“tradwife” lifestyle influencers is the homemaker lifestyle: Women staying
home, not having a job outside the house, cooking, cleaning, tending to many
children, and being content doing it.
Influence
and advertising often go hand-in-hand on platforms like TikTok. Brand
sponsorships ask influencers to advertise their product, which often enhances
the influencers' "brand". Advertising itself has long been an
influential aspect of life. Similarly to lifestyle influencers selling their
“brand”, advertisements in the mid-20th century often influenced the desired
lifestyles of women. Katherine J. Parkin’s book Food is Love: Food Advertising
and Gender Roles in Modern America, talks about how advertising has shaped
gender roles in the 20th century. Parkin’s explains to the reader a deeper
understanding of what advertisements create within a society: “Fundamentally,
advertising seeks to shape. That it might at times have reflected reality was
coincidental, but not its purpose. While it is tempting to use advertisements
as a historical record of the past. They cannot serve as windows into the
reality of people’s lives. Instead, they can only reveal the ideologies and
messages that advertisers hoped to sell products… advertisers used images and
text not only to influence consumers’ purchases, but also to sell gender
roles.” (5.) Parkins notes that after a change in desired perception by
companies in 1947, “ads relied almost exclusively on the ideal of young,
attractive women. These women, usually smiling seductively, serves as the
promise of things to come for those who consumed the product.” (172). Brands
following trending advertisement styles, such as young, attractive women
showing off a product, create more engagement. But they also encourage a deeper
advertisement. Not for the products being sold, but for the desire to be that
young woman. A constant reminder that, if you wish to become this woman, you
must buy this product. If you don’t buy this product, you can never be this
woman.
You may think advertisements
showing off a “perfect” woman don’t affect those who see them. However,
advertisements can influence a person on a very deep and personal level. In
Betty Friedan’s book, The Feminine Mystique, Betty says that there is a thing
that almost all women suffer from. It’s the desire to be something that is
unattainable. These desires have been pushed upon women by things that they
encounter in their daily lives. Based on Betty Friedan's experience and talking
with other women about life in the 1950s, she says:
“The public image, in the magazines
and television commercials, is designed to sell washing machines, cake mixes,
deodorants, detergents, rejuvenating face creams, hair tints. But the power of
that image, on which companies spend millions of dollars for television time
and ad space, comes from this: American women no longer know who they are. They
are sorely in need of a new image to help them find their identity. As the
motivational researchers keep telling the advertisers, American women are so
unsure of who they should be that they look to this glossy public image to
decide every detail of their lives.” (Freidan 96.)
When consistently confronted with
an “ideal” image, these women became unsure of who they were. There was a
constant drive to achieve what magazines told women was “ideal.” The bar for
“perfection” was constantly rising with women. When confronted with so-called
“perfection,” these women were left feeling inadequate. In Betty Friedan's
words: “I think that this has been the unknown heart of woman’s problem in
America for a long time, this lack of a private image. Public images that defy
reason and have very little to do with women themselves have had the power to
shape too much of their lives. These images would not have such power, if women
were not suffering a crisis of identity.”
There is an idea that housewives in
the 50s were happy homemakers. However, there is also an opposing and more
widely accepted reality: that many housewives in the 50s were quite miserable
in their roles. After World War II, numerous women who had been employed in
traditionally “masculine” jobs like manufacturing were fired in order to return
those jobs to men returning from the war. At the same time, much advertising
and government influences encouraged women to stay home and start families for
the returning soldiers. Initiatives like the GI Bill contributed to the
expansion of suburban family home construction. The average age at which both
men and women first married dropped significantly after World War II as well.
During this period, there were very few options available for women. A woman
could either raise a family at home and or work a job with very little pay and
room for growth. The women who opted to raise a family were those struggling
with numerous mental health issues. The song, “Mother’s Little Helper” by the
Rolling Stones describes a housewife who takes drugs to cope with her
unsatisfying life. Valium became the drug of choice for many housewives. Also
known as Diazepam, Valium is a depressant used for anxiety, muscle spasms, and
seizures. This drug gained popularity because many women experienced nervous
breakdowns. Imagine if you were left at home with nothing to do except clean,
cook, and care for children. At first, it may be manageable, but with little
emotional support from husbands who worked every waking hour to support the
family, one begins to feel isolated and alone in their own home. The
advertisements during this time did not help either. With each new issue of a
magazine, the latest and greatest products were promoted. And like we discussed
earlier, the advertisements also sold a “perfect” American family and woman.
Women in the 50s had little to no choice over the matter of becoming wives and
homemakers. The lives they were compelled to live were incredibly harmful to
their mental health.
This isn’t to say that staying home,
caring for children, and living an all-natural lifestyle is wrong. Many women
would prefer doing so rather than having a 9-5 job. Feminism has changed the
United States in a way that women are now able to make the choice of staying
home or working a job. However, nowadays it is rare for families to not rely on
two incomes. Many families with children depend on income from both parents to
pay for childcare, insurance, loans, rent, and groceries. According to Julie
Sullivan with the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Based on 2015–17 CE data...
the proportion of “both full time” households is 52 percent. So, even among
households with children, dual-income households make up two-thirds (66
percent) of the total.” The majority of households with children in the U.S.
consist of two full-time incomes. However, Ballerina Farm has a thriving
company that sells animal products from her family's farm. This business
supports her lifestyle of staying home and caring for her children. But,
according to The Commerce Institute, as reported by the U.S. Bureau of
Statistics, “20.4% of businesses fail in their first year after opening, 49.4%
fail in their first 5 years, and 65.3% fail in their first 10 years.” Operating
a business from home is risky. A large number of businesses fail within the
first year of opening. Although Ballerina Farm operates a thriving business, it
is unrealistic for the majority of people. Sharing an unrealistic lifestyle
often sets people up for failure and disappointment.
In modern times, it's easy to be
influenced. You see someone wearing some new shoes and you think, “I’ve got to
have those!” Or maybe you see someone lifting weights while you scroll lazily
on your couch, and you get the feeling that you should be doing something
better with your life. That feeling exists for all kinds of lifestyle
influences. Especially when it comes to mothers and women watching tradwife
influencers. When confronted with a simple, easy life, of course you would wish
for that to be yours. You find yourself dreaming of what could be. But reality
sets in. Life isn’t what's shown to you through a screen. And yet, those videos
and posts are always on your feed. When constantly shown an image of a
“perfect” housewife, women often feel disappointed in themselves. Just as women
in the 1950s were shown the latest and greatest lifestyles of nuclear living,
women today are presented with the same concept, just in different clothing. Tradwife
influencers, like BallerinaFarm and Nara Smith, who showcase a more simplistic,
easy, and maternal lifestyle, are just doing what lifestyle influencers do:
selling unrealistic standards. By selling this tradwife lifestyle, they encourage
viewers to aspire to that standard of living. This leads to envy and dissatisfaction.
The 50s housewife was miserable and often relied on drugs to cope with the very
same life that tradwife influencers are selling. And those who cannot attain
that very lifestyle can feel inadequate.
Tradwife influencing is similar to
that of the advertisements shown to women in the 1950s and will likely have the
same effect in the future, if not already. Women in the 50’s, who were largely
forced to become homemakers, saw advertisements that sold them “perfection”,
but that same “perfection” was largely unattainable. In the 21st century, with
the emergence of social media, advertising has shifted into influencing.
Lifestyle influencers wishing to sell a life that is “perfect” and
advertisements selling a “perfect” woman are the same problem, simply with
different packaging. The effect of advertising in the past led women to despise
their lives, wishing to attain the unattainable. The gaining influence of the
tradwife movement is harmful because it sets up an increasingly unattainable
life in the same way advertisements set up an unattainable life in the 50’s.
Works Cited
Boucher, Brooke. “What are the
Benefits of Lifestyle Marketing?” WFSB Advertising, 23 Mar. 2022, https://www.wfsbadvertising.com/blog/what-are-the-benefits-of-lifestyle-marketing
Friedan, Betty. The Feminine
Mystique. 1963. Introduction by Anna Quindlen, New York, W. W. Norton and
Company, 2001. https://elearning.unipd.it/spgi/pluginfile.php/201754/mod_resource/content/1/The_Feminine_Mystique.pdf
Harwell, Drew. “How TikTok ate the
internet” The Washington Post, 14 Oct. 2023, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/interactive/2022/tiktok-popularity/
Parkin, Katherine J. Food Is
Love: Advertising and Gender Roles in Modern America. University of
Pennsylvania Press, 2006.
Sullivan, Julie. “Comparing
Characteristics and Selected Expenditures of Dual- and Single-Income Households
with Children.” U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Bureau of Labor
Statistics, Sept. 2020, https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2020/article/comparing-characteristics-and-selected-expenditures-of-dual-and-single-income-households-with-children.htm#top
“The Importance of TikTok Likes”, Entrepreneur.
1 May 2023. https://www.entrepreneur.com/en-au/growth-strategies/the-importance-of-tiktok-likes/450707
“What Percentage of Businesses Fail
Each Year? (2025 Data).” Commerce Institute, https://www.commerceinstitute.com/business-failure-rate/
Comments
Post a Comment